Shanghai
International Shipping Institute (SISI) released the Global Port Development Report (2017) in April 2018. The report
points out that after ten years of moderate adjustment, the global economy has
basically entered a transition stage from recovery to prosperity, various
indicators of major global economies are improving and stabilizing, with the
economic growth hitting 3.6%. With the stabilizing global economy overall and
increasingly active world trade, the global port and shipping industry is
expected to enter a consolidation stage before a new era of growth. In 2017,
the cargo throughput of major ports around the world grew by more than 5%.
1. Global
ports enter growth consolidation stage
-
European ports see steady growth
In
2017, the Eurozone and its major member states presented robust economic
performance. Boosted by the recovering manufacturing industry and the growth of
domestic and foreign demands, the international import and export trade in the
Eurozone became increasingly active. In 2017, the cargo throughput of major
ports in Europe increased by 4.9% year on year.
In
2017, the PMI and CCI of the manufacturing industry in the U.S. were at high
levels, and its real estate market picked up again. Benefited from the
short-term economic rally and the increasing major bulks trade in the U.S., the
cargo throughput of major ports in America surged by 7.1% year on year.
However, the U.S. has a strong tendency to resort to trade protectionism and
industrial protectionism. Under Donald Trump administration, the trade growth may
underperform the economic growth, and a great uncertainty still exists in 2018.
-
Asian
ports see faster growth
With
the regional economy boom in Asia, major ports in Asia embraced satisfactory
production performance in 2017. With China's increasing economic impact on
Asia, exports from Japan, South Korea and the ASEAN countries to China maintained
high. In addition, the increasing quality of China's products also boosted
China’s export volume, resulting in a 7.2% year-on-year growth rate of the
cargo throughput by major ports in Asia.
Chinese ports performed well in
production. With the overall
recovery of global foreign trade, China's reform and opening-up and the advance
of its "Belt and Road" strategy, China’s domestic and foreign trade
demands were on a constant rise, driving up both the transport volume and
imports and exports. In addition, China’s domestic consumption demand kept
expanding, as evidenced by a strong upward trend in its domestic cargo
throughput. In 2017, China’s ports above a designated scale accomplished a
cargo throughput of 12.64 billion t, up by 6.9% year on year. Specifically, the
foreign trade cargo throughput was 4 billion t, up by 6.4% year on year, and
the domestic cargo throughput was 8.64 billion t, up by 7.1% year on year.
South Korean ports enjoy stable production
performance. In 2017,
South Korean ports accomplished a cargo throughput of 1.57 billion t, up by
4.1% year on year, higher than the growth rate in last year by 0.9 percentage
points. Specifically, its automobile exports and coal imports grew by a
considerable margin, namely 14.4% and 11.6%, respectively.
-
African
ports see stable growth
In
2017, Africa's foreign trade demand enjoyed a steady rise with the improving
economic situation in Africa and in-depth cooperation between China and the
African countries along the "Belt and Road". The cargo throughput of
major ports in Africa rose by 3.5% year on year.
-
Australian
ports grow slowly
In
2017, cargo throughput growth of major ports in Australia slowed down due to
the impact of Hurricane Debbie and the contiguous humid weather, with a yearly
cargo throughput growth rate of only 2.3%. Specifically, the throughput slumped
by more than 7.2% at the Port of Hay Point, the biggest coal port in Australia.
Table 1 Global Top 20 Ports by Cargo
Throughput in 2017
(Unit: 10,000 tons)
Rank
|
Port
|
Cargo Throughput
|
Growth Rate
|
2017
|
2016
|
Trend
|
2017
|
2016
|
1
|
1
|
→
|
Ningbo-Zhoushan
|
100711
|
91777
|
9.73%
|
2
|
2
|
→
|
Shanghai
|
70563
|
70005
|
0.80%
|
3
|
3
|
→
|
Singapore
|
62617
|
59330
|
5.54%
|
4
|
4
|
→
|
Suzhou
|
60774
|
57376
|
5.92%
|
5
|
6
|
↑
|
Guangzhou
|
56619
|
52181
|
8.51%
|
6
|
7
|
↑
|
Tangshan
|
56540
|
51580
|
9.62%
|
7
|
8
|
↑
|
Qingdao
|
50799
|
50083
|
1.43%
|
8
|
9
|
↑
|
Port Hedland
|
50533
|
48451
|
4.30%
|
9
|
5
|
↓
|
Tianjin
|
50284
|
54914
|
-8.43%
|
10
|
10
|
→
|
Rotterdam
|
46735
|
46118
|
1.34%
|
11
|
11
|
→
|
Dalian
|
45105
|
42873
|
5.21%
|
12
|
12
|
→
|
Busan
|
40051
|
36235
|
10.53%
|
13
|
14
|
↑
|
Yingkou
|
36239
|
34702
|
4.43%
|
14
|
13
|
↓
|
Rizhao
|
36002
|
35062
|
2.68%
|
15
|
15
|
→
|
South Louisiana
|
30786
|
29491
|
4.39%
|
16
|
16
|
→
|
Gwangyang
|
29183
|
28304
|
3.11%
|
17
|
17
|
→
|
Yantai
|
28560
|
26536
|
7.63%
|
18
|
18
|
↓
|
Hong Kong
|
28155
|
25673
|
9.67%
|
19
|
19
|
↑
|
Zhanjiang
|
28152
|
25517
|
10.33%
|
20
|
20
|
→
|
Huanghua
|
26957
|
24511
|
9.98%
|
Source of data: websites of port
authorities, the Ministry of Transport of China.
2. Global
container ports enjoy robust growth
In
2017, the international container market constantly picked up under the impact
of the recovering global economy and trade environment. The throughput of
global container ports rose by 6% year on year to 740 million TEUs, hitting a six-year
high. It is estimated that, boosted by the active international commodity trade
and consumption market, the container throughput of global ports will maintain
a strong growing momentum in 2018. In particular, with adjustment in business
modes such as cross-border e-commerce and cross-border online shopping, and
with transformation in transport modes such as "bulk-to-containerized
cargo", the container throughput growth at global ports will still be better
than the cargo throughput. However, more cargo will go through direct routes to
ensure timeliness and efficiency of transportation, so the number of
transshipped containers at ports will keep decreasing, and the proportion of
empty containers will increase.
-
Asian ports see big boost
In
2017, China's strong economic growth significantly boosted Asia's import and
export trade. The container quantity at major ports in Asia further grew, registering
a sharp increase of 5.8% year on year to 400 million TEUs. Specifically, China’s
ports above a designated scale finished 240 million TEUs of container
throughput, accounting for 60% of the Asian total.
China’s container ports maintained high
growth. Driven by the stable economic growth
and further advance of the "Belt and Road" strategy, China's foreign
trade maintained a satisfactory rise in 2017. China’s ports above a designated scale
registered a year-on-year growth rate of 9.1% in container throughput.
Specifically, big container ports such as Shanghai, Ningbo-Zhoushan and
Guangzhou delivered outstanding performance. Shanghai Port accomplished a
container throughput of more than 40 million TEUs, up by 8.2%. Meanwhile,
Ningbo-Zhoushan Port and Guangzhou Port presented even stronger growth of
container throughput, namely 14.2% and 8.2%, respectively.
Southeast Asian container ports saw
stable growth. In 2017, the
container throughput growth of Southeast Asian ports ran flat with that in the
previous year at about 3%. Amid shipping alliance restructuring and liner
companies’ adjustment of their ports of call, the competition among major
container ports in Southeast Asia intensified. Specifically, the container
throughput of Port Tanjung, a port that alliances seldom called at, declined
sharply, while Port of Singapore and Port of Tanjung Pelepas, the two chosen as
pivotal ports by shipping alliances, showed good performance in terms of
container throughput, with their growth reaching 8.2% and 3.4%, respectively.
-
European
ports maintain stable growth
In
2017, buoyed by the overall trade recovery in Europe and the strong growth of
containers on the shipping routes of North America, Latin America and the Far
East, the container throughput of major ports in Europe maintained stable
growth of 5.0%, up by 1.7 percentage points over that last year.
-
American
ports see gratifying growth in container quantity
In
2017, the trade transportation demand in the U.S. was inhibited to some extent
under the impact of the governmental-dominated "local economy" and
"industrial return" program. However, the stable economic growth in
the country boosted domestic trade and trade with surrounding countries, and
ensured the constant improvement of foreign trade and the rapid development of
imports and exports. Therefore, the container throughput of major ports in the
U.S. maintained rapid growth of 7.4% in 2017.
-
Growth
of African container ports rallies
In
2017, the container throughput of African ports rose by 5.6% year on year, shaping
a stark contrast with with the drop of 3.4% last year. This can be primarily
attributed to the impetus of China's "Belt and Road" strategy which
has increased the infrastructure investment in Africa and stimulated the growth
of Africa's local economy and trade. Meanwhile, with other international investment
enhancing and trade demand of construction projects surging, Africa's local
economic and trade demand also rose steadily.
Table 2 Global Top 20 Ports by
Container Throughput in 2017
(Unit: 10,000 TEUs)
Rank
|
Port
|
Container Throughput
|
Growth Rate
|
2017
|
2016
|
Trend
|
2017
|
2016
|
1
|
1
|
→
|
Shanghai
|
4023
|
3713
|
8.35%
|
2
|
2
|
→
|
Singapore
|
3367
|
3090
|
8.96%
|
3
|
3
|
→
|
Shenzhen
|
2521
|
2411
|
4.56%
|
4
|
4
|
→
|
Ningbo-Zhoushan
|
2461
|
2157
|
14.09%
|
5
|
5
|
→
|
Hong Kong
|
2076
|
1963
|
5.73%
|
6
|
6
|
→
|
Busan
|
2047
|
1946
|
5.19%
|
7
|
7
|
→
|
Guangzhou
|
2037
|
1858
|
9.63%
|
8
|
8
|
→
|
Qingdao
|
1830
|
1801
|
1.61%
|
9
|
9
|
→
|
Los Angeles-Long
Beach
|
1688
|
1564
|
7.93%
|
10
|
10
|
→
|
Dubai
|
1540
|
1539
|
0.06%
|
11
|
11
|
→
|
Tianjin
|
1507
|
1450
|
3.93%
|
12
|
13
|
↑
|
Rotterdam
|
1373
|
1239
|
10.82%
|
13
|
12
|
↓
|
Kelang
|
1198
|
1305
|
-8.20%
|
14
|
15
|
↑
|
Antwerp
|
1045
|
1004
|
4.08%
|
15
|
16
|
↑
|
Xiamen
|
1038
|
960
|
8.13%
|
16
|
14
|
↓
|
Kaohsiung
|
1027
|
1046
|
-1.82%
|
17
|
17
|
→
|
Dalian
|
971
|
959
|
1.15%
|
18
|
18
|
→
|
Hamburg
|
880
|
891
|
-1.23%
|
19
|
19
|
→
|
Tanjung Pelepas
|
826
|
799
|
3.38%
|
20
|
20
|
→
|
Laem Charbang
|
778
|
719
|
8.21%
|
Source of data: official websites of
ports, the Ministry of Transport of China.
3. Global
dry bulk ports see stable growth
In
2017, the mean value of BDI was 1,145 points, up by 70% year on year. The
freight rate gradually entered an uptrend of recovery and adjustment, and the
international demand for iron ore and coal rose on the whole. Because of the
growth in emerging economies and the accelerating urbanization progress, major
countries and regions such as India and ASEAN had rapidly growing demand for
infrastructure materials, and the growth of iron ore throughput picked up at
major ports. In terms of coal, 2017 marks the first year after Paris
Agreement came into effect, and various countries in the world pushed
forward energy transformation and upgrading, weakening the global demand for
coal consumption. In addition, the focus of global coal consumption at ports exhibited
an eastward trend. Developed countries such as European countries used clean
energy to replace coal, while most Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam
and Indonesia used coal for power generation, driving up the coal demand.
Table 3 Dry Bulk Cargo Throughput of Major
Ports in 2017
(Unit: 10,000 tons)
Port
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017年
|
Growth Rate of
2016
|
Growth Rate of
2017
|
|
Q1
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
Total
|
Hedland
|
44626
|
47893
|
11603
|
13176
|
12628
|
13126
|
50533
|
7.32%
|
5.51%
|
Qinhuangdao*
|
21740
|
15177
|
5609
|
5385
|
5591
|
5565
|
22150
|
-30.19%
|
45.94%
|
Rotterdam
|
8774
|
8230
|
2172
|
1963
|
1980
|
1902
|
8017
|
-6.20%
|
-2.59%
|
Singapore
|
1815
|
1864
|
440
|
495
|
438
|
486
|
1859
|
2.70%
|
-0.27%
|
Antwerp
|
1380
|
1255
|
315
|
297
|
308
|
298
|
1218
|
-9.04%
|
-3.70%
|
Source of data: official websites of
ports, the Ministry of Transport of China.
4.
Global
liquid bulk throughput grows slowly
In
2017, with the international oil price fluctuating up within a narrow range, 24
major oil producers, including OPEC member states, reached a capacity trimming
agreement featuring 1.8 million barrels per day for the first time over the
past eight years, and the agreement was extended to the end of 2018, which was
a major driver of the rising price. The long-term petroleum capacity trimming
agreement by OPEC member states reduces the global petroleum supply, resulting
in the slow growth of global shipping volume of liquid bulk on the whole.
Benefiting
from China's policy that allows local oil refining enterprises in Shandong to
import crude oil independently, Qingdao Port, one of the major crude oil ports,
maintained strong growth in crude oil throughput which rose by 5.7% year on
year. Russia's fuel oil export decreased, resulting in a 10.8% decline of
mineral oil and petroleum throughput. The liquid bulk throughput at Port of
Antwerp showed good performance, rising by 5.7% year on year to 73.13 million
t.
5. Most
global terminal operators see growth in equity throughput
In
2017, the top six terminal operators in the world finished a total of 250
million TEUs of equity throughput. Except COSCO Shipping Ports Limited which suffered
negative growth, all other terminal operators enjoyed positive growth in equity
throughput. Specifically, the total throughput decrease of COSCO Shipping can
be primarily ascribed to the fact that the throughput of Qianwan Container
Terminal of Qingdao was no longer counted in. Hutchison Whampoa got rid of
negative growth. DP World enjoyed satisfactory performance, with its throughput
growth, up to 24.7, leading major terminal operators. With the global economic
and trade recovery gaining speed, it is estimated that the equity throughput of
terminal operators will continue to grow.
Table 4 Equity Throughput Rank of
Global Terminal Operators in 2017
Rank
|
Operator
|
2017/10,000 TEUs
|
2016/ 10,000 TEUs
|
Year-on-year Growth/%
|
1
|
PSA
|
5740*
|
5240
|
9.5%
|
2
|
HPH
|
4650*
|
4560
|
2.0%
|
3
|
APMT
|
3970
|
3730
|
6.4%
|
4
|
CMPort
|
3779
|
3490
|
8.3%
|
5
|
DPW
|
3648
|
2924
|
24.7%
|
6
|
COSCO Shipping
Ports
|
2940
|
2961
|
-0.6%
|
Total
|
Six operators
combined
|
24727
|
22905
|
8.0%
|
Note: * stands for estimated values;
Source of data: websites of terminal
operators.
6. Investment
in global terminals slows down
In 2017, the investment in global ports showed a trend of
moderate growth, and the port investment and infrastructure construction in
various countries slowed down. As ships get larger in size, ports already
started reconstruction and expansion or entered operation, and the demand for
investing in and building new ports was not strong yet. In addition, terminals
in some regions suffered from relatively low utilization and high idleness. The
demand for major bulks, in particular, fluctuated greatly, which retarded port
investment. Judging by construction demand, local ports and terminals were
updated and built in some regions primarily for the purpose of promoting
investment and stimulating economy, while overseas investment focused more on
port profitability. Therefore, large-scale terminal construction has been
decreasing. Region-specific,
underdeveloped regions such as South America and Africa showed great enthusiasm
for construction. At some terminals, the investment was even dominated by ship companies
to reduce logistics costs of shipping networks. Some veteran port operators and
global terminal operators preferred regional pivotal ports, and renovated or
expanded terminals to gather cargoes in the region.
|