中文 | Homepage
Login | Contact Us
Search
loading...
Information Resource
Industrial Updates
Shipping Review
Maritime Dictionary
China Shipping Information Website
Singapore-China Economic & Trade Website
Indonesia-China Economic & Trade Website
China Shipping & Ports
China Shipping Database
China Shipping Newsletter
China Shipping Prosperity Index
Global Port Development
China Shipping & Ports
International Cooperation Department
Tel.: (+86-21) 65853850-8034
Fax: (+86-21) 65373125
E-mail: ICDept@sisi-smu.org
Shipping Review
Global container shipping had its best second quarter since 2010
Date:2020-09-14 Readers:
THE container shipping industry made US$2.7 billion in the second quarter, the highest it's been since 2010, reports London's Loadstar.

"Looking at the financial performance, the shipping lines have been able to navigate these uncertain times rather well," said SeaIntelligence Consulting's CEO Alan Murphy.

"This has to be the result of a combination of cost-cutting and higher freight rates - nearly all carriers recorded a higher freight rate compared with the second quarter of 2019," said Mr Murphy.

Hapag-Lloyd posted the highest profitability, at $146.40 per TEU, HMM saw an EBIT per TEU of $129.10, and Maersk was just higher at $129.30 per TEU.

Yang Ming was the least profitable, with $18.60 per TEU, which was just below OOCL at $45.10 per TEU, and Cosco, at $58.30 per TEU.

"This is a very positive development for the shipping lines, as the pandemic did not impact container shipping to the extent initially feared. Industry focus will likely now be on the third quarter, which is the peak cargo season," said Mr Murphy.

With fuel prices continuing to drop, carriers have begun to withdraw low-sulphur fuel surcharges, but have become detached from the cost spread between low-sulphur and traditional heavy fuel oil since the beginning of the pandemic.

"Forwarders do not like shipping line surcharges of any nature, and we are hoping other lines will follow suit and stop their low-sulphur surcharges, as well as reconsider their policies in regards to applying surcharges for anything from equipment imbalance to port congestion," said BIFA director general Robert Keen.

"Over the past few years, the number of surcharges and fees has continued to grow - often with no real explanation or justification. In the last few days, I have heard that one line is introducing a 'merchant haulage' surcharge, while another is adding a 'container compliance' charge," said Mr Keen.

"Where is the justification for adding a surcharge for general costs involved in running the business of container shipping? Some surcharges should already be consolidated within freight rates, with any required fluctuation being managed against that figure,"

http://www.shippingazette.com/menu.asp?encode=eng

Back:  Covid lockdowns could bring world shipping to a halt: expert
Next:  Mounting pressure on China exporters with soaring US shipping costs
China Shipping Database
China Shipping Database
Shipping Market Analysis
 
 
Copyright © 2008-2015 Shanghai International Shipping Institute (SISI) All Rights Reserved. Support by sk-vision & boondns. 沪ICP备05052059号-7