中文 | Homepage
Login | Contact Us
Search
loading...
Industrial Updates
International Shipping
Domestic Shipping
Ports
Logistics
International Shipping Center
China Shipping Prosperity Index
Global Port Development
China Shipping & Ports
International Cooperation Department
Tel.: (+86-21) 65853850-8034
Fax: (+86-21) 65373125
E-mail: ICDept@sisi-smu.org
Logistics
UK drivers give up 'piss-poor' container runs for lucrative delivery sector
Date:2021-08-27 Readers:
TRUCKERS in the UK appear to be abandoning container loads for the more-lucrative delivery sector, as the battle for drivers intensifies, according to London's The Loadstar.

Several hauliers said they were not only getting "much better" rates delivering produce such as bread or products for Amazon but were also not being exposed to "piss-poor" treatment.

One owner-operator said: "I've been running overnight trucking work this week - delivering bread, pallets and parcels. You get much, much better rates and driver hours are shorter.

"There is a trade-off, in that you're running the gauntlet of all the night closures and deadlines are tighter - especially for the likes of Amazon and Hermes - but it's 35 per cent more profitable than container work.

"That's on just one shift, if we had enough drivers we could double-shift the trucks and would really be making a killing, instead of container work that is just killing."

Another operator said one long-term contract aside, the firm had "binned container work" because of worsening treatment of drivers and the cost of doing business, with diesel rates continuing to climb.

The owner-operator said vehicles could get around 12.5 miles per gallon doing parcel work, compared with around nine when hauling containers.

"That means you could get, say, GBP460 (US$613) for a [container] run to Coventry, but if you used that time to do parcel work instead, you could get around GBP580, plus you are running their trailers, which are very lightly laden for the most part.

For the owner of one independent haulage firm based in Essex, the decision to walk away from the container business was not linked to the work itself, but the treatment the drivers received at the hands of port operators.

"The reason we no longer operate from Felixstowe is down to a combination of the port's attitude and the vehicle booking system," they told The Loadstar.

"But for drivers, I'd think they'd want to do container work because it is easy. They get to sleep during the day while their vehicle is being unloaded. I don't understand what more they could possibly want."

Meanwhile one driver claimed a major shipping line offered drivers an extra GBP30 per container not to 'jump ship' to parcels.

While the driver would not be drawn on the name of the carrier, another source claimed it was CMA CGM, a revelation the Essex-based operator said sounded "ridiculous", adding: "CMA CGM is one of the worst for hitting hauliers to lower their rates."

A CMA CGM spokesperson said the company would be responding to the claims, neither confirming nor denying them, but other sources said that with fuel rates as they were, customers would need to offer "much more" than GBP30 to keep drivers on.

https://www.shippingazette.com/menu.asp?encode=eng

Back:  Cainiao launches fast and cheaper China-S Korea sea freight service
Next:  US railways face more delays in wake of Hurricane Ida
China Shipping Database
China Shipping Database
Shipping Market Analysis
 
 
Copyright © 2008-2015 Shanghai International Shipping Institute (SISI) All Rights Reserved. Support by sk-vision & boondns. 沪ICP备05052059号-7