中文 | Homepage
Login | Contact Us
Search
loading...
Industrial Updates
International Shipping
Domestic Shipping
Ports
Logistics
International Shipping Center
China Shipping Prosperity Index
Global Port Development
China Shipping & Ports
International Cooperation Department
Tel.: (+86-21) 65853850-8034
Fax: (+86-21) 65373125
E-mail: ICDept@sisi-smu.org
Logistics
New York/New Jersey container traffic volumes jump 16%
Date:2011-03-16 Readers:

    Container cargo volumes at the Port of New York and New Jersey rose 16% in 2010, with throughput reaching 5.29m teu, including both empty and loaded containers.


    This was up from 4.56m teu in 2009, just 7,080 teu bellow the peak cargo traffic record levels reported in 2007, with the port retaining its top East Coast container handling port ranking and third nationally, behind the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.


    In 2010, the port handled 376,770 containers through its ExpressRail system, up 22.3% and nearing the annual record set in 2008. The port's total general cargo volume increased to 32.2m tonnes, up 28.2m compared to 2009. Imports alone grew by 14.3% to 21m tonnes, with general cargo exports growing by 13.9% from 9.8m tonnes (2009) to 11.2m tonnes last year.


    To meet the challenges of future growth, the Port Authority is to invest US$283m this year to upgrade the port road network, enhance the existing ExpressRail system and continue its project to deepen the port's channels to 15 metres (50 feet).


    Engineering and design work has already started on the "Raise the Roadway" project for the Bayonne Bridge to accommodate larger ships after the Panama Canal upgrades are completed in 2014.


    Development is continuing at the Global Container Terminal in Jersey City to accommodate future growth, including upgrading and expanding the capacity of the cross-harbour rail float barge operation between Brooklyn and Jersey City, along with plans to develop the Greenville Yards in Jersey City.


    However, the limited increase in revenue to the port authority generated by the increase in cargo volumes does not cover the costs of the port's annual state of good repair, nor does it cover all of the capital improvements needed to maintain the port's competitive position.

(Source:http://www.container-mag.com)
 

 

Back:  Shipowners brace for greenie attack over sulphur fuel content
Next:  Toll to acquire mining services provider for A$110m
China Shipping Database
China Shipping Database
Shipping Market Analysis
 
 
Copyright © 2008-2015 Shanghai International Shipping Institute (SISI) All Rights Reserved. Support by sk-vision & boondns. 沪ICP备05052059号-7